Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 01:29
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Et distinctio voluptatem magni repudiandae.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
If You Can Perform These 5 Moves at 60, Your Body’s Decades Younger - Eat This Not That
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Pocket is shutting down, so I switched to a self-hosted alternative - Android Authority
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Why do atheists want to see God so badly?
What’s next?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
How rough can the ferry passage from Hull to Rotterdam be in the autumn ( at the end of October )?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Thank you.
NASA discovers that Earth's twin planet, Venus, is not geologically dead - Earth.com
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
How did you adjust to civilian life after your military service in the British Army?